tDCS course Chapter 7 tDCS Methodology & Protocols - #30 - July 20, 2025
Deep Dive into tDCS Methodology: Key Considerations and Protocol Designs
In this episode of The Neurostimulation Podcast, we review chapter seven of the Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), which focuses on the methodological considerations for selecting tDCS protocols and devices. We discuss important factors such as electrode size and placement, stimulation intensity and duration, and the timing of tDCS sessions. The episode also covers the decision-making framework for clinicians, population-specific adjustments, and the comparison between clinic-based and home-based device use. The role of behavioral tasks during tDCS and the importance of methodological rigor in tDCS research and clinical practice are emphasized. Listeners are encouraged to understand the crucial elements of proper tDCS setup to ensure effective and replicable results.
00:00 Introduction to Chapter Seven Review
01:17 Importance of Methodology in tDCS
01:57 tDCS Decision Matrix
02:44 Defining Research and Therapy Goals
03:25 Key Variables in Protocol Design
05:11 Standalone vs. Adjunctive tDCS
06:16 Population-Specific Considerations
07:41 Clinic-Based vs. Home-Based Device Use
09:13 Session Frequency and Repetition
10:39 Integration with Behavioral Tasks
11:15 Final Thoughts and Conclusion
Transcript
In today's episode, we're going to review chapter seven of the
2
:Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct
Current Stimulation, Principles,
3
:Procedures, and Applications.
4
:Chapter seven is going to involve
an analysis of the methodological
5
:considerations for selection.
6
:Of tDCS approach.
7
:In chapter seven, we're going to look
at the methodological considerations for
8
:selection of tDCS approach protocols and
devices In this review of chapter seven,
9
:we're going to look at methodological
considerations for selection of
10
:transcranial direct current stimulation
approach protocols and devices.
11
:So we're going to look at how to
do tDCS properly: Protocol, device,
12
:and design decisions that matter.
13
:Today's episode is going to involve
a deep dive into an important topic,
14
:but one that's often overlooked
areas of tDCS methodology.
15
:How can you set up a tDCS research
study or a clinical session?
16
:The way that you set up your tDCS
research study or clinical session
17
:can make or break your results.
18
:So let's explore what goes into choosing
the right approach, whether you're
19
:working in a lab, a clinic, or exploring
home-based remote supervision use.
20
:So why does methodology matter in tDCS?
21
:It might seem like tDCS is a simple
tool, two electrodes, low current and go.
22
:But in reality, the effectiveness
and replicability of tDCS depends
23
:on a long list of factors.
24
:Things like electrode size and placement,
stimulation, intensity, and duration.
25
:Session frequency and course
duration, and whether stimulation
26
:is applied during a task or at rest.
27
:Even minor changes in these variables
can lead to different outcomes, and
28
:that's why evidence-based and carefully
considered protocol design is essential.
29
:So let's look at the tDCS decision matrix.
30
:The chapter introduces a decision
making framework that includes
31
:questions like: Is tDCS indicated
for this particular patient?
32
:What polarity should be
used and anodal or cathodal?
33
:What montage or placement of
electrodes and what electrode
34
:size is going to be optimal?
35
:Is the stimulation uni
site by site or multi-site?
36
:What frequency and duration of
treatment is going to be best?
37
:This is all visualized in a clinical
decision tree, which is figure 7.5
38
:in the textbook, and we'll show that here.
39
:And this guides the clinician
from the clinical question
40
:through to the protocol selection.
41
:So now we're going to define the
goal: research enhancement or therapy.
42
:So the protocol should begin
with identifying your goal.
43
:Are you trying to explore cortical
function in a research setting?
44
:Are you trying to enhance cognition
or motor skills in a neuro enhancement
45
:or neuro rehabilitation setting?
46
:Or are you trying to treat a condition
like depression or again, stroke
47
:recovery in a therapeutic sense?
48
:Each of these goals comes
with a different design need.
49
:For example, cognitive enhancement might
benefit from short repeated sessions
50
:where rehabilitation might require
longer high frequency type protocols.
51
:So what are some key
variables in protocol design?
52
:Let's talk about the big dials,
so to speak, that you can adjust.
53
:The first is electrode size and
placement smaller electrodes is
54
:going to equal greater ality.
55
:It's not hard to imagine that if you
have a smaller electrode with a smaller
56
:scalp contact, it's going to lead to a
greater vocality of electrical current.
57
:Larger electrodes, on the other
hand, are going to lead to a
58
:more diffuse current application.
59
:The second is stimulation site,
which we're going to choose based
60
:on the network activity and not
just that underlying neuroanatomy.
61
:Remember, no brain region
works in isolation.
62
:The third is montage,
type, montage or placement.
63
:There's cephalic, so-called
cephalic, C-E-P-H-A-L-I-C, which
64
:is both electrodes on the head.
65
:There's extra cephalic, which is
involving a return electrode on another
66
:part of the body, like on the shoulder
or arm, and there can be dual site or
67
:multi-site for complex network modulation.
68
:The fourth is timing.
69
:So online during a task, like a motor
task, a learning task, an emotional
70
:task, or some other sort of activity that
a person's doing in terms of movement
71
:or thinking or feeling versus offline,
which would be before or after a task.
72
:So stimulation before or after a
task, but technically at rest online
73
:appears to yield stronger behavioral
effects in the studies that are.
74
:Considering differences here online
appears to yield stronger behavioral
75
:effects in those particular studies
that are looking at differences in
76
:terms of online versus offline effects.
77
:Now let's have a look at standalone
tDCS versus adjunctive tDCS.
78
:So tDCS by itself versus
tDCS in combination with
79
:another treatment modality.
80
:This is a question, should tDCS be used
by itself, or is it best when paired
81
:with something else, or even multiple
other treatment options at the same time?
82
:Examples could include pain management.
83
:Pain management, is it best with tDCS
alone or in combination with other
84
:types of pain management strategies?
85
:Stroke rehabilitation, perhaps
using combinations of tDCS
86
:and active physiotherapy.
87
:Depression treatment, perhaps using
tDCS in combination with medications
88
:like SSRIs and/or psychotherapy,
like cognitive behavioral therapy.
89
:So remember, when we're combining
treatments, we want to use factorial
90
:designs in order to test for synergy
between combined treatment modalities
91
:like was used in the so-called select
tDCS trial for treatment of depression.
92
:Now let's look at some population
specific considerations.
93
:Certain special populations require
even more tailored protocols.
94
:For example, children with smaller
heads is going to involve an
95
:inherently different current flow.
96
:So use of lower intensities and close
monitoring for side effects will be
97
:important in older adults because of the
cortical atrophy that occurs during aging,
98
:that leads to a greater gap between the
outer surface of the cortex and the inner
99
:surface of the skull so that there's more
CSF or cerebrospinal fluid, outside of
100
:the brain bathing the brain, that can
lead to altered current distribution in
101
:terms of direct current emanating from
the electrode on the outside of the scalp,
102
:traveling through the scalp, then through
the tissues that are underneath the scalp,
103
:the so-called dura through the CSF, and
eventually to the cerebral cortex itself.
104
:This may require different electrode
montages or longer ramp times.
105
:What about certain neurologic
or psychiatric conditions?
106
:Well, custom electrode placement
may improve outcome in a
107
:condition dependent manner.
108
:So for example, monitoring for medication
interactions or symptom fluctuation
109
:during tDCS can lead to descriptions
that might be important in terms of
110
:identifying commonalities that can then
be integrated into treatment protocols.
111
:Now let's look at some differences between
clinic-based versus home-based device use.
112
:Certified tDCS devices fall
into two main categories.
113
:There are clinic-based devices, which
are typically programmable, often used
114
:in clinical trials or in hospitals or
outpatient clinics, and then there are
115
:home-based devices, which typically
will be also programmable but then
116
:once they're programmed, the settings
are locked to prevent people from
117
:interfering with the clinically prescribed
and carefully selected settings.
118
:And the use then is often remotely
supervised via telehealth or another way
119
:of the patient staying in contact with the
practitioner and in order to provide real
120
:time assistance and direction in terms of
the setup and in order to make sure that
121
:the device is being used in a safe manner.
122
:So for selecting a device, it's important
to consider things like the stability of
123
:the current that's being delivered, the
ramp features, so the ramp being the,
124
:the intensity of the current from zero
current, all the way up to the prescribed
125
:full current and how long that takes.
126
:And then on the other hand,
when the session is finished,
127
:when the ramp is going from the
full current down to zero again.
128
:So electrode impedance checks to make
sure that the actual contact between the
129
:electrode and the scalp is optimized.
130
:And then in research studies appropriate
blinding capabilities for sham treatments
131
:to compare with actual treatments.
132
:Now let's have a look at the
session frequency and repetition.
133
:So how often should tDCS be delivered?
134
:The old rule was longer is better, but
research has really shown that excessively
135
:long stimulation may actually trigger
homeostatic counter anti-regulation.
136
:So the brain is a homeostatic, the nervous
system, you know, altogether, and really
137
:you could expand that to say that the body
altogether is a homeostatic system: If
138
:there's a change, the brain in particular
will seek to counteract that change
139
:in order to maintain a balanced state.
140
:So studies showed that excessively
long tDCS stimulation is potentially
141
:going to trigger the brain's response
in terms of a homeostatic counter
142
:reregulation, which may in the end
kind of undo the positive therapeutic
143
:effects of shorter stimulation with tDCS.
144
:So instead, in order to find the sweet
spot in between those two states, the
145
:normal state where there are target
symptoms, and the excessive tDCS state,
146
:where the brain kind of counteracts
what the tDCS is trying to do in a
147
:therapeutic sense, what is being shown
is that repeated shorter tDCS sessions
148
:over the course of a day, is inducing
more robust therapeutic effects.
149
:And so this is what's known as within
session repetition, and it can produce
150
:effects that are lasting up to 24
hours in one particular session time.
151
:What about integration
with behavioral tasks?
152
:So it's becoming clear that when
you combine tDCS with certain
153
:tasks, amazing things can happen.
154
:For example, faster learning,
greater retention of information
155
:and improvement of mood.
156
:But there is also a flip side.
157
:Certain studies are showing a
potential interference between
158
:stimulation and task performance
if it's poorly timed or mismatched.
159
:So what appears to be important
is to align the task, type,
160
:the stimulation target, and the
session schedule very carefully.
161
:So some final thoughts.
162
:It's important to look at this
as a methodological toolbox.
163
:Designing effective tDCS protocols appears
to be a combination of art and science.
164
:You need to match your stimulation
parameters to your goal.
165
:You need to consider the
population that you're treating.
166
:You need to choose devices and
montages or electrode placements.
167
:That are based on feasibility
and scientific rigor.
168
:You need to test and refine through
careful measurement and reporting.
169
:If it's a study and the more
standardized and transparent our
170
:methods are going to be, the faster
the field will be able to move forward.
171
:And for research protocols, obviously
it's important to test and refine through
172
:careful measurement and reporting.
173
:So the more standardized and transparent
that our methods are, the faster
174
:that the field will move forward.
175
:Thanks again for joining me for this
deep dive into tDCS methodology.
176
:Whether you're a researcher or a
clinician or someone who's just curious
177
:about how this is being done, it's
important to remember that how you set
178
:up your stimulation protocol matters as
much as whether you stimulate at all.
179
:Just a quick reminder to please
like and subscribe to the podcast.
180
:It's the best way to ensure
that you never miss an episode.
181
:I would also encourage you to share
this with someone that you think
182
:might benefit from understanding more
about this revolutionary technology,
183
:uh, someone who's involved with the
early stages of designing research or
184
:someone who's interested in integrating
this into their clinical practice.
185
:And please leave a comment or ask a
question in the comment section below.
186
:Please also suggest a topic that you'd
like us to review in a future episode.
187
:So until next time, don't forget
to tune in to the next episode,
188
:and I will see you there.
189
:Please stay well, stay curious.
190
:And we'll see you again on
The Neurostimulation Podcast.