Episode 29

full
Published on:

31st Jul 2025

tDCS course Chapter 6 Safety of tDCS - #29 - July 13, 2025

Neurostimulation Podcast – Chapter 6: tDCS Safety – Myths, Evidence, and Best Practices

Episode Overview:

In this episode, host Dr. Michael Passmore explores Chapter 6 of the "Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Principles, Procedures, and Applications." The focus is on the safety of tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation), addressing common myths, reviewing the latest research, and outlining best practices for both clinical and home use.


Key Topics Covered:


Introduction to tDCS safety and the framework for evaluation

Distinction between adverse events and adverse effects

Review of evidence from over 33,000 tDCS sessions and 1,000+ individuals

Insights from animal studies and their relevance to human safety

Risk assessment protocols in both animal and human studies

Safety considerations for vulnerable populations (children, stroke survivors, epilepsy, individuals with implants)

Home use of tDCS: evidence, compliance, and telehealth supervision

Debunking common myths about tDCS safety:


Myth 1: tDCS hasn’t been tested long enough

Myth 2: tDCS is dangerous for older adults

Myth 3: tDCS can cause permanent brain damage

Common mild side effects and how to prevent them

Real-world safety guidelines and recommendations for practitioners and researchers

The importance of ongoing vigilance, ethics, and future directions in tDCS safety research


Takeaway Message:

When applied responsibly and following evidence-based protocols, tDCS is one of the safest forms of neuromodulation available today. Home use is safe under supervision, and vulnerable groups can be included with tailored protocols. Ongoing research and monitoring will continue to refine best practices.


Resources & Links:


"Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Principles, Procedures, and Applications"

For questions, comments, or topic suggestions, leave a comment below or reach out via the podcast’s contact page.


Connect with Us:

Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and leave a review! Share this episode with colleagues, patients, or anyone interested in the science and safety of tDCS.


Stay Curious, Stay Informed!

Transcript
Mike:

Welcome back to the Neurostimulation Podcast.

2

:

Now we're going to explore chapter

six in the textbook that we've been

3

:

reviewing called Practical Guide to

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation,

4

:

Principles, Procedures, and Applications.

5

:

In chapter six, we're going to unpack

the latest findings in tDCS safety

6

:

in both human and animal studies.

7

:

We're going to break myths down, and

we're going to highlight the current

8

:

best practices for risk management in

both clinical and research settings.

9

:

So let's look at the framework for

safety evaluation first of all.

10

:

a foundation really is that this

particular chapter in our textbook builds

11

:

upon the 2016 tDCS safety consensus and

follows the World Health Organization's

12

:

definitions, distinguishing between

so-called adverse events, which are

13

:

incidents that might be coincidental

and adverse effects, which are incidents

14

:

that are causally linked to tDCS.

15

:

So what's the gold standard of concern?

16

:

Serious adverse effects, which could

include things like brain tissue injury,

17

:

lasting functional impairment or adverse

outcomes that lead to hospitalization or

18

:

death, causally linked to stimulation.

19

:

Notably, temporary sensations like

tingling, itching, or mild headaches

20

:

don't count under this strict

definition of safety, those are

21

:

considered to be tolerability issues.

22

:

So what the evidence tells us across

more than 33,000 tDCS sessions and

23

:

over 1000 individuals in formal

trials, there has been zero evidence

24

:

of irreversible brain injury.

25

:

There's been no causal link to things

like seizures or hospitalizations

26

:

due to conventional protocols at

around, less than or equal to 40

27

:

minute sessions at less than or

equal to 40 milliamperes of current.

28

:

Animal studies are backing this up.

29

:

Even when tissue damage was observed

in animal models, it only occurred

30

:

at stimulation levels and order

of magnitude higher than what's

31

:

used in clinical tDCS in humans.

32

:

So for conventional tDCS, safe

by all evidence-based measures.

33

:

Now let's look at how risk is

assessed in animals and humans.

34

:

Animal data is used to establish

a damage threshold by identifying

35

:

the lowest current level that

causes histological brain injury.

36

:

Histological is a technical term that

refers to injury that's observable

37

:

at the level of the brain tissue.

38

:

So if you were to take, um, in the lab,

if you were to take, uh, a brain, a

39

:

cadaver sample of a brain that's been

donated for research and you're to do a

40

:

thin slice and have a look at the actual.

41

:

Brain tissue itself.

42

:

Then histological damage relates

to what you can see either with the

43

:

naked eye or with a microscope that

relates to the actual tissue sample.

44

:

Researchers avoid using oversimplified

summary metrics like total electrical

45

:

charge or charge density unless the

mechanisms of injury are well understood.

46

:

Why is that?

47

:

Well, it's because metrics like

charge can obscure important

48

:

interactions between things like time,

electrode size, and brain anatomy.

49

:

In humans, controlled trials

use predefined stopping rules

50

:

to err on the side of safety.

51

:

For example, in epilepsy studies,

trials are paused if seizure frequency

52

:

increases by a set percentage, even

if the link to tDCS is not confirmed.

53

:

What about vulnerable populations?

54

:

Let's look at some key populations

where safety concerns often arise.

55

:

Current modeling is suggesting

different current flow patterns due

56

:

to the smaller skulls in children,

but no adverse effects reported when

57

:

using age appropriate protocols.

58

:

What about stroke survivors?

59

:

Out of over 500 participants across

33 stroke studies, only 14 have

60

:

dropped out, and none were due to

serious tDCS related adverse effects.

61

:

How about epilepsy?

62

:

There were no reported

seizures caused by tDCS.

63

:

In fact, cathodal tDCS may

actually have an anti epileptogenic

64

:

effect, an anti-seizure effect by

reducing cortical excitability.

65

:

What about people with brain implants,

skull plates, or other cranial implants

66

:

are excluded from some studies, but

this is often precautionary, not because

67

:

there's any proven increased risk.

68

:

Now let's look at is home tDCS safe?

69

:

The short answer, yes.

70

:

If it's done right and under supervision,

clinical trials involving home use of tDCS

71

:

have shown no serious adverse effects when

using medical grade regulated devices.

72

:

High compliance and tolerability when

combined with telehealth supervision

73

:

and proper caregiver training.

74

:

One patient with schizophrenia

even completed over:

75

:

sessions over three years

without any serious side effects.

76

:

The takeaway message, home use is

safe if protocols are followed.

77

:

What are some common

concerns and misconceptions?

78

:

Now let's tackle some myths.

79

:

Myth number one, tDCS has

not been tested long enough.

80

:

In reality, multiple clinical trials with

over 100 sessions in certain individual

81

:

patients spanning months to years

shows no evidence of cumulative harm.

82

:

Myth number two, it's

dangerous for older adults.

83

:

In reality, 600 plus older adults have

safely participated in tDCS trials

84

:

with no serious events reported.

85

:

Myth number three, it could

cause permanent brain damage.

86

:

In reality, lasting neuroplasticity is

part of the goal, but without meeting

87

:

the strict criteria of tissue injury

or lasting dysfunction, such changes

88

:

don't qualify as safety concerns.

89

:

In fact, they likely relate to the

positive effects of this technology.

90

:

The chapter of the textbook cautions

against unscientific alarmism, and it

91

:

calls for caution based on speculation

rather than evidence, which may

92

:

actually impede research progress.

93

:

Now let's look at what could potentially

go wrong and how we can avoid that.

94

:

Mild adverse effects can happen.

95

:

Things like skin irritation

under the electrodes.

96

:

Tingling or mild discomfort

under the electrodes and

97

:

temporary fatigue or sleepiness.

98

:

Most of these mild side effects are due

to things like poor electrode preparation.

99

:

For example, if it's a sponge type

electrode, if there is an inadequate

100

:

amount of saline solution or gel so

that the sponge is is overly dried out.

101

:

It could be related to improper placement

or montage of the electrodes on the

102

:

scalp, and it could be potentially

related to usage errors in other off-label

103

:

or DIY type knockoff applications.

104

:

The fix here is standardized training,

quality medical grade equipment,

105

:

and good skin contact techniques.

106

:

Now let's consider some final safety

guidelines and map out the road ahead.

107

:

So what are the real world

safety takeaways here?

108

:

We need to be looking at conventional

tDCS parameters less than or

109

:

equal to 4 mA, less than or

equal to 40 minutes per session.

110

:

These are evidence backed and safe.

111

:

Serious adverse effects are

extremely rare and causally unproven.

112

:

Home use is safe under supervision

and vulnerable groups can be safely

113

:

included with tailored protocols.

114

:

However, vigilance is still important.

115

:

It's important to use ethics research

board approved protocols in studies

116

:

to maintain clear stopping rules and

also to track all events carefully.

117

:

Future safety updates will likely

come from larger long-term data sets.

118

:

Better real-time monitoring and

integration with biomarkers of risk.

119

:

So in closing, when it's applied

responsibly, transcranial direct

120

:

current stimulation appears to

be one of the safest forms of

121

:

neuromodulation currently available.

122

:

It offers a compelling

combination of accessibility.

123

:

Portability, low cost and safety,

all backed by thousands of

124

:

sessions and robust research data.

125

:

Thanks again for tuning in.

126

:

I really appreciate your time,

your attention, and your curiosity.

127

:

If this helped to clarify any doubts that

you might have had about tDCS' safety,

128

:

please share this with colleagues,

patients, anyone that you think might

129

:

be interested in learning more about

this technology, don't forget to like

130

:

and subscribe to this podcast to make

sure that you never miss an episode,

131

:

please leave a review, a question or

a comment in the comment section below

132

:

as well as any suggestions for topics that

you'd like us to cover in future episodes.

133

:

So until next time, don't forget to

tune into the next episode of the

134

:

Neurostimulation Podcast and we'll

see you there In the meantime, take

135

:

care, be well, and stay curious.

Show artwork for The Neurostimulation Podcast

About the Podcast

The Neurostimulation Podcast
Welcome to The Neurostimulation Podcast, your go-to source for the latest in clinical neurostimulation! Here, we dive deep into the revolutionary techniques that are shaping the future of health care.

Whether you're a healthcare professional, a student, or simply passionate about neuroscience, this podcast will keep you informed, inspired, and connected with the evolving world of neurostimulation.

Subscribe for episodes that stimulate your mind and enhance your understanding of brain health and treatment.

podscan_YIPb4jA8fBJ5ino2RSuBo3BdjrOmPM6c

About your host

Profile picture for Michael Passmore

Michael Passmore

Dr. Michael Passmore is a psychiatrist based in Vancouver, BC, with expertise in neurostimulation therapies. Having completed specialized training in multiple neurostimulation modalities, including electroconvulsive therapy at Duke University and transcranial magnetic stimulation at Harvard University, Dr. Passmore brings a robust clinical and academic background to his practice. Formerly the head of the neurostimulation program in the department of Psychiatry at Providence Health Care, Dr. Passmore now serves as a clinical associate professor at the University of British Columbia’s Department of Psychiatry. From his clinic, ZipStim Neurostimulation (zipstim.com), Dr. Passmore offers private, physician-supervised, home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) treatments tailored to clients across Canada.​